Fiat Panda 2001 vs Renault Twingo 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Fiat Panda engine produces 6 HP less power than Renault Twingo, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Renault Twingo. Despite less power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Twingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Panda consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Panda could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Panda consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Twingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Kangoo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Twingo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller. Fiat Panda is 19 cm shorter than the Renault Twingo, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 230 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 959 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 1.1 metres less than that of the Renault Twingo, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`345 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Twingo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Renault Twingo, so Renault Twingo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Renault Twingo has
| |