Fiat Panda 2001 vs Renault Clio 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Fiat Panda engine produces 6 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Renault Clio. Despite less power, Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Fiat Panda consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Panda could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Panda consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller, but slightly higher. Fiat Panda is 36 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | 1`420 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Fiat Panda has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Fiat Panda, so Fiat Panda quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Renault Clio has
| |