Fiat Panda 2004 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 70 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Fiat Panda is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Panda engine produces 5 HP more power than Renault Clio, but torque is 15 NM less than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller, but higher. Fiat Panda is 27 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 1.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Panda, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Renault Clio has
| |