Fiat Panda 2005 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 102 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Fiat Panda is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Panda and Renault Clio have the same engine power, but Fiat Panda torque is 9 NM more than Renault Clio. Fiat Panda reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Fiat Panda consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Fiat Panda over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Panda consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 530 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller, but higher. Fiat Panda is 27 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Fiat Panda has 49 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 1.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Renault Clio has
| |