Fiat Panda 2005 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 15 seconds | |
| Fiat Panda engine produces 6 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Panda is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Panda consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Fiat Panda over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Panda consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 550 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.54 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller, but higher. Fiat Panda is 27 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Fiat Panda has 49 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 1.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 800 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Clio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Panda, so Renault Clio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Renault Clio has
| |