Fiat Panda 2012 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 69 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 102 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Fiat Panda engine produces 6 HP less power than Skoda Citigo, but torque is 7 NM more than Skoda Citigo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Panda consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Panda could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Panda consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller, but higher. Fiat Panda is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Citigo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 251 litres | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Fiat Panda has 45 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.7 metres less than that of the Skoda Citigo, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`305 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Citigo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Panda has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Citigo, so Skoda Citigo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |