Fiat Panda 1986 vs Rover 100 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Fiat Panda is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Rover 100 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.8 - 1.1 | 1.1 - 1.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 34 - 54 HP | 60 - 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 57 - 88 NM | 90 - 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 - 23 seconds | 8.6 - 14.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.6 | 5.9 - 6.9 | |
|
Fiat Panda petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 100. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.56 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller, but higher. Fiat Panda is 11 cm shorter than the Rover 100, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 229 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 552 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.3 metres less than that of the Rover 100. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 814 | ~ 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
| |