Fiat Panda 1986 vs Renault Clio 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Fiat Panda is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Renault Clio can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 0.8 - 1.1 (petrol) | 1.1 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 34 - 54 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 57 - 88 NM | 93 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 - 23 seconds | 9.6 - 15.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 8.6 | 5.2 - 7.6 | |
|
Fiat Panda petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.41 m | 3.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.50 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Panda is smaller, but slightly higher. Fiat Panda is 36 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 814 | ~ 1`498 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Panda has
|
Renault Clio has
| |