Fiat Panda 1986 vs Peugeot 106 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Fiat Panda
1986 - 2003
Peugeot 106
1996 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Fiat Panda is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Peugeot 106 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 0.8 - 1.1 (petrol)1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 34 - 54 HP50 - 118 HP
Torque: 57 - 88 NM74 - 145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 - 23 seconds8.7 - 19.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 8.65.3 - 8.8
Fiat Panda petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 106.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.41 m3.68 m
Width: 1.50 m1.59 m
Height: 1.44 m1.38 m
Fiat Panda is smaller, but higher.
Fiat Panda is 27 cm shorter than the Peugeot 106, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Panda is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data215 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data953 litres
Turning diameter: 9.5 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Panda is 1.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Fiat Panda can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 814~ 1`328
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 14001200
Pros and Cons: Fiat Panda has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Peugeot 106 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv