Fiat Marea 1996 vs Volvo V40 2016
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 124 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 265 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Fiat Marea engine produces 4 HP more power than Volvo V40, but torque is 15 NM less than Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 3.4 | |
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Marea consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Marea could require 615 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 40 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Fiat Marea is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Marea is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Marea is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Fiat Marea can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`920 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |