Fiat Marea 1996 vs Fiat Bravo 2010
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 124 HP | 165 HP | |
Torque: | 265 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
Fiat Bravo is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Marea engine produces 41 HP less power than Fiat Bravo, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Fiat Bravo. Due to the lower power, Fiat Marea reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 5.3 | |
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Marea consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Marea could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
1050 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
Fiat Marea is 4 cm longer than the Fiat Bravo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Marea is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Marea is 1.1 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Fiat Marea can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`830 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Marea has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |