Fiat Marea 1996 vs Fiat Bravo 2010
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 147 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 186 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Fiat Marea is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Marea engine produces 27 HP more power than Fiat Bravo, but torque is 114 NM less than Fiat Bravo. Thanks to more power Fiat Marea reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 4.6 | |
The Fiat Bravo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Marea consumes 5.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Marea could require 780 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
Fiat Bravo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
Fiat Marea is 4 cm longer than the Fiat Bravo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Marea is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Marea is 0.7 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Fiat Marea can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`830 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | low | |
Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Marea has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |