Fiat Marea 1996 vs Volvo V40 2016
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 101 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Marea engine produces 19 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Fiat Marea reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 3.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 4.9 l/100km | |
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Marea consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Marea could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Marea consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 40 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
910 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Fiat Marea is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Marea is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 335 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Marea is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`920 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | above average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 11 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |