Fiat Marea 1996 vs Renault Scenic 2006
Body: | Sedan | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 101 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Marea engine produces 29 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Fiat Marea reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.0 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Marea consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Marea could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Marea consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
910 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.26 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.62 m | |
Fiat Marea is 12 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Marea is 20 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 406 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`010 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 6.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Marea has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |