Fiat Marea 1996 vs Seat Inca 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Fiat Marea is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Marea engine produces 72 HP more power than Seat Inca, whereas torque is 51 NM more than Seat Inca. Thanks to more power Fiat Marea reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 54 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Inca engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Inca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1436 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Marea has
|
Seat Inca has
| |