Fiat Marea 1996 vs Seat Inca 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Fiat Marea is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Marea engine produces 38 HP more power than Seat Inca, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Seat Inca. Thanks to more power Fiat Marea reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 54 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Inca engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Brava | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Inca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1436 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Marea has
|
Seat Inca has
| |