Fiat Marea 1996 vs Seat Inca 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Fiat Marea is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Marea engine produces 28 HP more power than Seat Inca, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Seat Inca. Thanks to more power Fiat Marea reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 54 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Seat Inca engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Brava | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Seat Ibiza, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Seat Inca might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1436 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Marea has
|
Seat Inca has
| |