Fiat Marea 1996 vs Chrysler Neon 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 154 HP | 115 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 304 NM | 152 - 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 15.4 seconds | 8.8 - 11.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 10.3 | 8.0 - 8.5 | |
|
Fiat Marea petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Neon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Fiat Marea is larger. Fiat Marea is 2 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 3 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Marea is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Fiat Marea has more luggage capacity. Fiat Marea has 66 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Marea is 0.6 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon, which means Fiat Marea can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`291 | ~ 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Marea has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |