Fiat Marea 1996 vs Renault Scenic 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 - 154 HP | 85 - 165 HP | |
Torque: | 144 - 304 NM | 127 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 15.4 seconds | 8.6 - 14.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 10.3 | 5.1 - 8.6 | |
Fiat Marea petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Fiat Marea equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.26 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.62 m | |
Fiat Marea is 12 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Marea is 20 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 406 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
Fiat Marea has more luggage capacity. Fiat Marea has 24 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Marea is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Fiat Marea can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`291 | ~ 1`959 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | below average | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 6.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Marea has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |