Fiat Marea 1996 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.4 | 1.8 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 154 HP | 112 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 304 NM | 163 - 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 15.4 seconds | 10.5 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 10.3 | 6.4 - 9.3 | |
|
Fiat Marea petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera Tino. On average, Fiat Marea equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.61 m | |
| Fiat Marea is 12 cm longer than the Nissan Almera Tino, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Marea is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Fiat Marea has 10 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. This could mean that the Fiat Marea uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Marea is 0.9 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera Tino, which means Fiat Marea can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`291 | ~ 1`908 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |