Fiat Freemont 2011 vs Volvo XC90 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Fiat Freemont) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volvo XC90) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Freemont engine produces 73 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 30 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Fiat Freemont reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 11.5 | |
|
The Fiat Freemont is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Freemont consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Fiat Freemont over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Freemont gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Fiat Freemont is 8 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Freemont is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 145 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 600 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1461 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 104 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 376 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Freemont is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Fiat Freemont can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`510 kg | 2`760 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Freemont has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |