Fiat Freemont 2011 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Freemont engine produces 20 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Due to the lower power, Fiat Freemont reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Freemont is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Freemont consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Fiat Freemont over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Freemont consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Freemont gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Fiat Freemont is larger, but lower. Fiat Freemont is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 3 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Freemont is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1461 litres | 2091 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 630 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Freemont is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`510 kg | 2`880 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`089 kg | 2`160 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 421 kg | 720 kg | |
| Fiat Freemont load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 71 procentiem less than Nissan Pathfinder. Therefore, Nissan Pathfinder is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Freemont has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |