Fiat Freemont 2011 vs Mercedes ML 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Freemont engine produces 88 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 270 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Fiat Freemont reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Freemont is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Freemont consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Fiat Freemont over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Freemont consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Freemont gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes ML 2011 3.0 engine: The Mercedes-Benz OM642 is a 3.0-liter V6 diesel widely used in many models under the 3.0 CDI or 350 CDI designation. It is known for strong performance and good durability when maintained properly, and well-kept engines are capable of exceeding 500,000 km. At the same time, the unit has several characteristic weak ... More about Mercedes ML 2011 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.80 m | |
| Fiat Freemont is 8 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Freemont is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 690 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 690 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1461 litres | 2010 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 549 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Freemont is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`510 kg | 2`950 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`089 kg | 2`175 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 421 kg | 775 kg | |
| Fiat Freemont load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is almost two times less than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Freemont has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |