Fiat Freemont 2011 vs BMW X5 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 381 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Freemont engine produces 211 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 390 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Fiat Freemont reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Freemont is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Fiat Freemont consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Freemont could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Freemont consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 209 mm (8.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW X5 2013 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Fiat Freemont and BMW X5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1461 litres | 1870 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 409 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Freemont is 1.1 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Fiat Freemont can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Freemont has
|
BMW X5 has
| |