Fiat Freemont 2011 vs Volvo XC90 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Freemont engine produces 55 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Fiat Freemont reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 71 litres | |
| 900 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 185 mm (7.3 inches) | 238 mm (9.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Fiat Freemont is smaller. Fiat Freemont is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Freemont is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 145 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1461 litres | 1886 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 105 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 425 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo XC90 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo XC90 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Freemont has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |