Fiat Doblo 2001 vs Renault Scenic 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 63 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.9 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Doblo engine produces 57 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 182 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Fiat Doblo reaches 100 km/h speed 8.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.8 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Doblo consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Doblo could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Fiat Doblo is smaller, but higher. Fiat Doblo is 10 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Doblo is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Doblo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Scenic has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Doblo, so Renault Scenic quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Scenic has
| |