Fiat Doblo 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 63 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Doblo engine produces 52 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 147 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Fiat Doblo reaches 100 km/h speed 10.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 5.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Doblo consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Doblo could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.52 m | |
| Fiat Doblo is 11 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Doblo is 28 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Doblo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |