Fiat Doblo 2001 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Doblo engine produces 7 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Fiat Doblo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Doblo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Doblo could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Doblo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Stilo | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Fiat Doblo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
| Fiat Doblo is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Doblo is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Doblo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Scenic has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Doblo, so Renault Scenic quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Scenic has
| |