Fiat Doblo 2005 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Fiat Doblo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Doblo engine produces 10 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, but torque is 40 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Thanks to more power Fiat Doblo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Doblo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Doblo could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Doblo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Fiat Doblo is smaller, but higher. Fiat Doblo is 3 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Doblo is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 750 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Doblo is 1 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Fiat Doblo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Citroen Xsara Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Doblo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara Picasso, so Citroen Xsara Picasso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Doblo has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |