Fiat Doblo 2010 vs Citroen Berlingo 2012
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 127 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Citroen Berlingo is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Doblo engine produces 3 HP less power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Citroen Berlingo. Due to the lower power, Fiat Doblo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Berlingo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Doblo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Doblo could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Doblo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Stilo, Fiat Grande Punto | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Doblo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Fiat Doblo is 1 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Doblo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 790 litres | 675 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3000 litres | |
|
Fiat Doblo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Doblo has 115 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Doblo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Doblo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Fiat Doblo, so Fiat Doblo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Doblo has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |