Fiat Doblo 2010 vs Renault Scenic 2012
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Doblo engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Fiat Doblo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Fiat Doblo consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Doblo could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Fiat Doblo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
1390 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Grande Punto | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Fiat Doblo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Renault Scenic 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Scenic 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.85 m | 1.64 m | |
Fiat Doblo is 2 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Doblo is 21 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 790 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1870 litres | |
Fiat Doblo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Doblo has 320 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Doblo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 1`967 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Doblo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4000 | 6000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Doblo has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |