Fiat Doblo 2010 vs Citroen Berlingo 2012
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 19.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Doblo is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Doblo engine produces 15 HP more power than Citroen Berlingo, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Citroen Berlingo. Thanks to more power Fiat Doblo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Fiat Doblo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo, which means that by driving the Fiat Doblo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Fiat Doblo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen Berlingo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Fiat Grande Punto | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Doblo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Fiat Doblo is 1 cm longer than the Citroen Berlingo, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 790 litres | 675 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3000 litres | |
|
Fiat Doblo has more luggage capacity. Fiat Doblo has 115 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Doblo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen Berlingo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`970 | 2`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Doblo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Berlingo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Fiat Doblo, so Fiat Doblo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Doblo has
|
Citroen Berlingo has
| |