Fiat Croma 1989 vs Volkswagen Passat 1985
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 54 HP | |
Torque: | 186 NM | 100 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 20.3 seconds | |
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 36 HP more power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 86 NM more than Volkswagen Passat. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 7.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.3 | |
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.38 m | |
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 5 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
| |