Fiat Croma 1989 vs SAAB 900 1984
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 10 HP less power than SAAB 900, but torque is 24 NM more than SAAB 900. Despite less power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 9.8 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 900, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 705 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 24 cm shorter than the SAAB 900, 7 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.3 metres more than that of the SAAB 900. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
SAAB 900 has
| |