Fiat Croma 1986 vs SAAB 900 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 217 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
SAAB 900 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 39 HP less power than SAAB 900, but torque is 37 NM more than SAAB 900. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 10.1 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 900, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 19 cm shorter than the SAAB 900, 7 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.3 metres more than that of the SAAB 900. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
SAAB 900 has
| |