Fiat Croma 1991 vs Rover 200 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 247 NM | 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 82 HP less power than Rover 200, but torque is 10 NM more than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.9 | |
| Fiat Croma consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 30 cm longer than the Rover 200, 8 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 352 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.4 metres more than that of the Rover 200, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Rover 200 has
| |