Fiat Croma 1991 vs Rover 200 1993

 
Fiat Croma
1991 - 1996
Rover 200
1993 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 118 HP200 HP
Torque: 247 NM237 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.5 seconds6.5 seconds
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving.
Fiat Croma engine produces 82 HP less power than Rover 200, but torque is 10 NM more than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.27.9
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Fiat Croma consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.22 m
Width: 1.76 m1.68 m
Height: 1.44 m1.40 m
Fiat Croma is larger.
Fiat Croma is 30 cm longer than the Rover 200, 8 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data352 litres
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.4 metres more than that of the Rover 200, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`615
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons: Fiat Croma has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Rover 200 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv