Fiat Croma 1991 vs Ford Sierra 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 118 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 247 NM | 229 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Sierra is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 28 HP less power than Ford Sierra, but torque is 18 NM more than Ford Sierra. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 11.6 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 4.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 660 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 7 cm longer than the Ford Sierra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |