Fiat Croma 1993 vs Volkswagen Polo 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 102 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 97 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 6.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 525 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 80 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 975 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |