Fiat Croma 1993 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 91 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 89 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 7.4 | |
|
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 20 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |