Fiat Croma 1993 vs Mazda 626 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Fiat Croma engine produces 5 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.5 | |
| Fiat Croma consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 626 has
| |