Fiat Croma 1993 vs Seat Ibiza 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 162 HP | 60 HP | |
Torque: | 213 NM | 107 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 102 HP more power than Seat Ibiza, whereas torque is 106 NM more than Seat Ibiza. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 7.1 | |
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 71 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 12 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 270 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 580 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.8 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`370 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |