Fiat Croma 1993 vs Mazda 323 1989
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 72 HP more power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Mazda 323. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 7.4 | |
|
The Mazda 323 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda 323 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 26 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 8 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |