Fiat Croma 1993 vs Citroen Xantia 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 59 HP more power than Citroen Xantia, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Citroen Xantia. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 8.2 | |
|
The Citroen Xantia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen Xantia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.38 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 8 cm longer than the Citroen Xantia, width is practically the same , while the height of Fiat Croma is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.4 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Fiat Croma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Citroen Xantia has
| |