Fiat Croma 1991 vs Rover 200 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 247 NM | 237 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 6.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 200 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 50 HP less power than Rover 200, but torque is 10 NM more than Rover 200. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.9 | |
|
The Rover 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Fiat Croma could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 30 cm longer than the Rover 200, 8 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 352 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.4 metres more than that of the Rover 200, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`615 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 200 has
| |