Fiat Croma 1993 vs Rover 200 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Fiat Croma engine produces 4 HP more power than Rover 200, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Rover 200. Despite the higher power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.9 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 200, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 30 cm longer than the Rover 200, 8 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 352 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.4 metres more than that of the Rover 200, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
| |