Fiat Croma 1991 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 26 HP more power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Seat Toledo. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.7 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is larger. Fiat Croma is 20 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |