Fiat Croma 1991 vs SAAB 9000 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9000 is a more dynamic driving. Fiat Croma engine produces 56 HP less power than SAAB 9000, whereas torque is 15 NM less than SAAB 9000. Due to the lower power, Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 9.9 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9000, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 720 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Fiat Croma is smaller, but slightly higher. Fiat Croma is 24 cm shorter than the SAAB 9000, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Fiat Croma is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.3 metres less than that of the SAAB 9000. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
SAAB 9000 has
| |