Fiat Croma 1991 vs Mazda 626 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 76 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 18 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Mazda 626. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.8 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 1 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 747 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |