Fiat Croma 1991 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Fiat Croma is more dynamic to drive. Fiat Croma engine produces 21 HP more power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 68 NM more than Toyota Carina E. Thanks to more power Fiat Croma reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.8 | |
|
The Fiat Croma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Fiat Croma consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that by driving the Fiat Croma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1330 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Croma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
| Fiat Croma is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 6 cm wider, while the height of Fiat Croma is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Fiat Croma is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E, which means Fiat Croma can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Fiat Croma has
|
| |